Lung Lost Love

The American Cancer Society has published their 2011 estimates of new cancers cases and deaths.

New Cases
Prostate and breast cancers top the list with the highest number of new cases for men and women, respectively.  Fortunately, a routine physical often leads to early detection, and early detection leads to a very high survival rate.  For example, the 5-year survival rate for stage IIa breast cancer is 81%.  The survival rate for local prostate cancer (similar to stage I and II) is 100%.

Lung cancer tops the list with the highest number of deaths for both men and women.  In fact, it kills nearly the same amount of people as colon, breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers combined.  In my opinion, the problem is two-fold.  First, there is no approved process for early detection of lung cancer (i.e. colonoscopy, mammogram, self-exam).  You and your doctor certainly can’t palpate your lungs to feel for lumps and changes!  As such, diagnosis is often made after the patient is symptomatic (like coughing up blood) in late stages.  The 5-year survival rates for stages IIIa, IIIb, and IV are 14%, 5%, and 1%, respectively.

The other problem is effective treatment.  Even when lung cancer is caught early, the prognosis isn’t stellar.  Compared with the breast cancer statistic above (81%), the stage IIa non-small cell lung cancer survival rate is only 30%.

So let’s look at the story of breast cancer.  First, it’s the most successfully marketed disease of all time.  From inception through 2010, Susan G. Komen for the Cure raised $1.5 billion.  A whopping $540 million went to research alone.  And this is only one (albeit the largest) of several dedicated organizations.  In addition, the US government invested more than $631 million in breast cancer research in 2010 alone.  Prostate cancer was the next highest funded ($300 million) and lung cancer the third ($282 million).

My goal isn’t to fight some sort of ‘cancer injustice.’  After all, discoveries made in one area of research sometimes benefit others.  But I do think lung cancer needs a better PR firm.  It is under-funded and under-researched.

Perhaps that’s due to the smoking stigma.  Most people assume that you get lung cancer because you smoke.  The truth is that smoking can cause several types of cancer in the body’s organs and makes you more susceptible to every type cancer.  But if someone told you they had pancreatic cancer, you wouldn’t ask them if they were a smoker, would you?

And finally, lungs just aren’t sexy.  Breasts, on the other hand, have always been popular.  It should be no surprise that they get plenty of attention in their time of need!  Maybe someday we’ll see professional athletes wearing gear to support lung cancer.

Oh, one more thing for this rant: Can we get a new color?  Lung cancer is currently represented with a clear or white or pearl-colored ribbon.  I have a proposal, though.  The new ribbon for lung cancer should be the jolly roger flag: black with skulls and crossbones.  Now THAT would increase awareness!


4 responses to “Lung Lost Love

  • Bonnie Facemyer

    I like that Jolly Roger flag idea 🙂 You hang in there, sweetie!

  • RoniLynn

    I am 100% in agreement with everything you posted. If you have a moment can you check out my blog posts? I touch on all of this indirectly in a few of my posts. Very early in my blogging life (a full 3 months ago), I started writing about the stigma attached to lung cancer. I came to the same conclusions as you…that lung cancer does not have a ‘dedicated’ foundation or fundraising arm. It is unfortunate that it took one woman dying for the Susan G. Komen foundation to exist. Sadly, more die from lung cancer than breast cancer. But no one wants to ‘help’ those who some say can help themselves by not smoking. If only it were that simple.

    And yes, not having a simple way to detect lung cancer is probably the second biggest obstacle we face. I guess the #1 biggest obstacle is negative attitudes. But that’s for another post. My mom never had a cough. She only ‘felt’ lumps on either side of her neck, in her lymph nodes. She’s a former biology teacher and she knew something wasn’t right. A few days later we discovered it was cancer and not too long after that found out it already had spread from her lungs to her liver. She was diagnosed at Stage IV. That was 2008. Though she’s much weaker, it’s 2012 and she’s still here. How is it that lung cancer can sneak around in her body and she, nor her doctors, even realize it? THAT’S what’s scary…not knowing until it’s almost too late. Or in some cases, it is too late.

    I admire your fight. Keep it up. I plan to do the same for my mom.

  • RLS

    Very nicely stated. Lung cancer needs a new PR firm. Thanks for the smirk. 😉

  • Denise

    I have stage IV NSC Lung Cancer. I haven’t had any evidence of disease for 19 months now! I was diagnosed in Jan 2011 at the age of 40. I believe a realistic, positive attitude is very important to our well being while kicking cancer’s a$$!! I love your idea of the ribbon with skulls & crossbones!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: